|

- UID
- 17
- 帖子
- 45651
- 精華
- 1
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 來自
- India
- 在線時間
- 10363 小時
- 註冊時間
- 12-7-2009
- 最後登錄
- 23-7-2020
|
My old RG1 ran about 11~12L/100km. My RK1 runs avg. 8~8.5L/100km with 75% highway. It seems better fuel consumption in using CVT.
plt01 發表於 28-4-2011 23:16  I think mainly is not because CVT, but the engine...
R20A engine seems provide better torque at low RPM than K20A/K24A engine which makes a 7/8 seater save much more gas....
Also, the placement of the engine & CVT on RK has improved the speed of warming up the transmission oil, which will improve the efficiency of the CVT. |
|