2.4慳油過2.0?

spikeout2

2.4慳油過2.0? 係唔係真架?

alliven

2.4慳油過2.0? 係唔係真架?
spikeout2 發表於 21-7-2010 17:02

Yes, becasue it runs with 7-speed CTV tranny!

Simoni

我日夜都係highway, 我2.4, 行左52000km, 平均1.5/km 左右la.

spikeout2

多謝大家既資料. 有個車行既sales話我聽, 2.4無可能慳油過2.0. 仲話2.4既波箱(無段變速)易壞好多喎

alliven

多謝大家既資料. 有個車行既sales話我聽, 2.4無可能慳油過2.0. 仲話2.4既波箱(無段變速)易壞好多喎
spikeout2 發表於 21-7-2010 17:15

如果買二手的話,波箱易壞真係唔奇.因為都唔知上手點"保養"!

x4dragstar400

2.4慳油過2.0? 係唔係真架?
spikeout2 發表於 21-7-2010 17:02

http://www.stepwgnhk.com/viewthr ... t=gas%2Bconsumption

my 17" tyre, 2008 2.0 4AT
21. 06jul09-40.004L    done356.5km:    $1.56/km @13.87/L   (dis$1.41),   11.22L/100km,    total 7875km

22. 19jul09-40.004L    done408.7km:    $1.33/km @13.59/L   (dis$1.20),   9.788L/100km,    total 8283km

spikeout2

6# x4dragstar400

your car is 2.4?

sammykwan

多謝大家既資料. 有個車行既sales話我聽, 2.4無可能慳油過2.0. 仲話2.4既波箱(無段變速)易壞好多喎
spikeout2 發表於 21-7-2010 17:15

If you have heavy loading (take more than 5 people in the car) most of the time, then 2.4 will consume less gas than 2.0.

Otherwise, 2.0 should consume less gas.

If you compare CVT and normal 4-speed, I also believe CVT's life time is short. But it doesn't really mean it is easily to break down.

Some people has some old concept still thinking CVT is some sort of new technology stuffs, but it is actually last decade's technology la......

x4dragstar400

6# x4dragstar400

your car is 2.4?
spikeout2 發表於 21-7-2010 19:59

sorry ...mine is 2008 2.0

"無段變速易壞好多喎??!!"

hm...50/50.....i think it last very long if u maintain it well . say replace HMMF
CVT fuild every 2 years.....or even once a year in extreme condition.

but there are many CVT broke down so far in hk in last 10 years, bmw mini, benz A class, civic EK, jazz...........

and the real figure in our club.

1 x 2.4 CVT broke down last year
0 x 2.0 4AT broke down  so far

sammykwan

sorry ...mine is 2008 2.0

"無段變速易壞好多喎??!!"

hm...50/50.....i think it last very long if u maintain it well . say replace HMMF
CVT fuild every 2 years.....or even once a year in extreme con ...
x4dragstar400 發表於 22-7-2010 01:00

do you think CVT may have better protection on the engine coz it always keep the engine running at low rpm......
the real figure in our club.

0 x 2.4 engine broke down with CVT
3 x 2.0 engine broke down with 4AT

mextony

do you think CVT may have better protection the engine ......
the real figure in our club.

0 x 2.4 engine broke down with CVT
3 x 2.0 engine broke down with 4AT
sammykwan 發表於 22-7-2010 01:11

CVT may have better protection the engine <=== no~
honda 賣六、七架2.0先賣一架2.4, 出貨量同故障率係成正比
btw....有我地會三架2.0冧曷咩？

gary個架無做保養出事
我個架就衰激玩前無換曷油
仲有一架係？.......

sammykwan

CVT may have better protection the engine
mextony 發表於 22-7-2010 01:27

then 激玩 and 無做保養 should be the key break down reason for both engine and transmission......

spikeout2

如果我多數唔會full load, 多數少過4個人. 係唔係應該買2.0呀?

x4dragstar400

CVT may have better protection the engine
mextony 發表於 22-7-2010 01:27

e...no one told me  wor!!!....anyone posted before???
冧曷? or 冧 gearbox ah?...i'm focusing on gearbox in this thread

"gary個架無做保養出事
我個架就衰激玩前無換曷油
仲有一架係？"

but a 2.4 CVT had died , the owner told me...

though, both are ok if they r  in proper maintaintence way.

mextony

e...no one told me  wor!!!....anyone posted before???
冧曷? or 冧 gearbox ah?...i'm focusing on gearbox in this thread

"gary個架無做保養出事
我個架就衰激玩前無換曷油
仲有一架係？"

but a 2.4 CVT ha ...
x4dragstar400 發表於 22-7-2010 12:12

係冧曷.....
落左bee-racing電腦仔之後曷油要轉 0W-40
我用返5W-40,又行左成七千仲未得閒換曷油
出事前一晚屯門暴走到元朗....
等二日返工北大嶼山公路出事
燒嘩佬同爆死氣爭口

but a 2.4 CVT had died , the owner told me...<===電王？